# YouTube upload playback, audio and colour checklist

Review the final exported file first, then the processed YouTube playback. If higher resolutions are initially missing, record processing state and the device before assuming the file is defective. The release decision should follow the actual viewing result, not only an editor preset.

YouTube playback review

Video reference and final export version:
Source duration, dimensions and frame rate:
Upload date and visibility arrangement:
Reviewer and viewing device/browser:
Available playback qualities at review time:
Processing observation:
Opening and end-frame review:
Audio sync and meaningful speech:
Observed colour difference versus the source:
Caption file/version and imported timing:
Framing or padding problem:
Thumbnail/title promise versus the actual answer:
One concrete issue and evidence:
Chosen correction or later recheck:
Final release decision:


## Inspect the exported file

- [ ] The complete intended edit is present, including its end.

- [ ] Speech is audible and synchronised with the relevant action.

- [ ] The frame contains the useful subject without distortion.

- [ ] Colour appearance matches the intended master on an appropriate review setup.

- [ ] The caption version belongs to this exact edit.

## Separate different kinds of observation

"Observation","Evidence to record","Useful next check"
"Higher playback qualities are not yet offered","Time since upload, processing and current quality menu","Review after processing rather than changing an unseen cause"
"A quality is missing on one device","Device/browser and available playback options","Compare another appropriate device"
"Colours differ from the source","Mastering and colour metadata plus actual playback","Check export metadata and compare viewing setups"
"Speech no longer matches the action","Exact time point in source and upload","Determine whether the issue is already in the exported file"
"Captions drift after an edited introduction","Video and caption versions","Synchronise to the final edit"


## Do not treat processing as a fixed countdown

YouTube says new uploads initially process in low quality and higher qualities can take additional time. Its troubleshooting page also notes that device or browser limitations can affect quality availability, and suggests reviewing colour metadata against the master when colours differ.

If your workflow permits an unlisted review, the primary guidance suggests that approach before making all qualities publicly available. Record the actual visibility arrangement and check the processed result; do not promise that every upload finishes after a particular number of minutes.

## Resolve one observed issue

Locate the evidence: Keep the affected time point, version, device and current playback setting. A general comment that the video 'looks wrong' is difficult to act on.

Compare source and upload: If the source already has the issue, changing the public title will not repair the file. If it appears only in one playback setup, investigate that difference.

Record the correction: Keep the new export or caption version and recheck the affected passage. Do not mark the release complete merely because a replacement upload started.